Editorial Policy
Complaints about content
If you believe something on this site is inaccurate, defamatory or misleading, write to the editors with the URL, the paragraph in question and a short explanation of what you consider wrong. We reply within two working days, investigate, and either correct the page or explain why we stand by the original wording. A complaint never results in silent deletion; if a page is removed, a note appears at its address stating that fact.
Corrections
If a reader or a colleague spots an error, we correct the page as soon as the fix can be verified, mark the correction in the footer with the date, and keep the original wording in an internal change log so that we can audit the edit later. Minor typos are corrected silently. Material corrections — a changed number, a reversed verdict, a retracted claim — always get a visible note on the page.
Sources
Primary sources for our pages are the Betano app itself and its web counterpart, the operator's licence conditions, regulator notices published by state agencies, and conversations with the operator's PR line when a factual question needs a second confirmation. Secondary sources — competitor reviews, forum threads, Reddit posts — are useful for context but never for a specific number. If a number on this site has only a secondary source behind it, we either chase it down or leave the claim out.
Independence from operators
The editorial team has no stake in Betano or any other operator and no commercial obligation to return a particular verdict. We do earn a commission from links that end in a new Betano registration, and that is disclosed in the advertising disclosure page. Commission is calculated on sign-ups, not on wins or losses; nothing about the amount a reader loses or wins changes what we are paid, and nothing about an operator's spend with us changes a published verdict.
Principles
Three rules sit above everything else we publish. First, every page must be useful to someone arriving from search with a concrete question — if a paragraph cannot pass that test, it is cut. Second, promotions are described exactly as they appear inside the Betano app: wagering requirements, max-bet caps, expiry windows and currency are copied verbatim, not paraphrased, because paraphrasing is where numbers quietly change. Third, we never run copy that reads like an advertorial; if a section would read better as marketing material, we rewrite it or drop it.
Fact checking
Before publishing we check every claim against the source noted during research. Numbers are re-read against the Betano page they came from; links are opened once more in a fresh tab to make sure they resolve to the expected destination; screenshots of the install screen are compared against the version number currently shipping. A second editor reviews long guides before they go live.